The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gambling.
No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites providing both complimentary casino-style video games and lucrative rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to point out claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as traditional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income in 2015 alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited gaming in a New York suit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)
'I'm not sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.
Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of stars from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online
Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are totally free
Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media
Learn more
Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
Instead, ads normally focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for real sports betting losses.
Others lure clients with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.
'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.
Another caption explained: 'Because I never ever quit.'
The inconsistency in between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complex, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.
A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, most of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.
'Most social sweeps consumers never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting sites.'
Social casinos use customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the alternative to purchase worthless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real cash, however can be used to open numerous functions within the video games.
But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling customers to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.
And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker event
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and estates
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't need normally need identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.
Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to send mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thus offering them a reason to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real cash.
So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all however 7?
According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.
'Social sweepstakes games are simply a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important difference in between social sweeps and traditional online gambling websites like casinos.'
Think of the way that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.
And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.
'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all sort of daily companies in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
But to many gambling industry experts, that argument does not cut it.
For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, therefore recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
'They don't last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash giveaways.
'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the attributes frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payment portion for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is a minor share of the income made by the business [typically less than one percent]'
Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually given that been shuttered over allegations of illegal gaming.
DJ Khaled is among numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face similar scrutiny.
'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually repeatedly been cited by courts and state lawyer generals as key elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in fact a guise for prohibited gambling.'
One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the issue.
'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are giving up substantial tax and earnings opportunities as this sports betting changes that carried out through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.
And after that there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.
Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
In the most recent claim, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited gambling business. '
Apple and Google have likewise been called as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.
'We usually don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.
'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games throughout most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, producing not just great games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.
'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to intensely protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'
The concerns between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show bothersome for some celeb endorsers.
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues want to forecast a strong position against prohibited gambling - especially when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.
It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a lifetime restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.
In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting allegedly unlawful gambling sites
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.
Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.
Asked if their star endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to clients the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.
'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'A few of our worths are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.
'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious illegal sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at danger in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some danger that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful sports betting.'
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
